![]() Nevertheless, a better personality may also lead to aĬhange of research focus towards trying to answer better questions.įor the orientation of my reader, the Swedish Personality of the scientist as expressed in his scientific work, asĮxemplified here in the advanced field of Quantum Physics – QF (also known as ![]() My message in this essay will be that theĭialogue between Pauli and Jung is valuable mainly for improving the Motivation to problematize and to write the present text. Motivated me to write a paper on Information and Debate. Of mine and about Jung with common cultured and educated engineers who already What I myself experience when trying to share thoughts about the present text Thoughts about panpsychism that would submerge all her argumentation. my references in the essay on computerization ), and Such as Roger Penrose and Sabine Hossenfelder (cf. the Science of Consciousness with its thoughts about e.g. She cannot, however, force a meeting with the scientificĬommunity of e.g. Occasionally, and only in Gieser’s text all of themĪre forced to meet each other in their likewise forced relation to the also Historical stream of thought some of them having met They are giants in each one of their own particular Text may be seen as a derivative work, or a great conversation. History of Western Philosophy” when I read it as a young man, with theĭifference that I now have important reservations about it. It would be like reviewing Bertrand Russell’s “A Hanging in the garden, since I perceive Gieser as standing on the shoulder of giants. It may be like a bird pecking at a tallow ball Swedish text, together with somewhat unstructured reflections on the wholeĮnglish and Swedish text. Here and at my age (84), however, I will cut it shortīy means of some cursory comments on the English summary of the original Than 700 pages with a bibliography of almost 4500 entries, partly generated in It was apparently irrefutable, consisting of more My academic engagement with another author’s “encyclopedic” doctoral thesisĪbout Gnosticism and computer science. Tried to study, I have only seen a similar writing style and tour de force in Disregarding the works of philosophers that I Richness of detailed references, testifying an intense and long personalĬommitment that would require a comparable commitment from whoever wishes toĬhallenge or even comment it. Gieser’s work is overwhelming in its scholarly ambition and The book in a note at the end of this essay). (See bibliographic details of the dissertation and of Psychology and Quantum Physics: Wolfgang Pauli’s Dialogue with C.G. Revised translation as The Innermost Kernel. The following text is aĬommentary starting with the English summary of a Swedish PhD dissertation by Suzanne Gieser on the relation between the theoretical physicist Wolfgang Pauli and Its increased mathematization in quantum physics. Upon what can be learnt from what has happened to modern physics as seen from On the conception of computers as embodied mathematics and logic, and on computerization as design of “empty” logic that I call “logic acrobatics”. ![]() I did already address this in mainly two previous works In studying theĮssence of computerization I see its relations toĭepths psychology and to the process of increase mathematization and logic Professional activity has been to understand the guidelines for the ongoingĬomputerization of society on the basis of its consequences.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |